FLOCKINGHELLPUBLIC MONEY / PUBLIC ROADS / PUBLIC SAY
[ THE REPORTS DESK ]

WHAT ACTUALLY
HAPPENED.

Every report is summarised here in full, so you can read what happened without leaving. The link to the original reporting is always on the page, clearly labelled, because a claim you cannot check is worth nothing.

Win
The jurisdiction decided against the cameras: not renewed, not pursued, or cancelled.
Partial win
Use was suspended, paused, or narrowed, but the agreement itself still stands.
Ongoing
Live dispute. A vote, a review, or a removal question is still unresolved.
Contract retained
The jurisdiction kept the cameras, whatever the public turnout looked like.
Removal verified
Reporting confirms the hardware actually came down, not just that a vote happened.
Safety review
The installation itself is under challenge on road-safety or permitting grounds, separately from any privacy or contract question.
Deployment expanded
A new contract was signed or an existing one grew. Recorded because a tracker that only counts wins is advertising.
OngoingUnited States (federal)

Two Republican bills would cut federal money for police using Flock cameras

Published by
Newsweek
Date
Location
United States (federal)
Status
Ongoing

The response has reached Congress, and it is coming from the right. Representative Tim Burchett of Tennessee introduced H.R. 9800, the Protection Against Mass Surveillance Act, on 21 July 2026; it was referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. The bill would bar federal agencies from buying, operating or accessing automated plate recognition, facial recognition and biometric identification systems, names Flock Safety explicitly, and would stop state, local and tribal governments spending federal funds on the same. Data collected in violation would have to be deleted within 30 days and would be inadmissible in court. Separately, Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky has said he will sponsor a bill withholding federal money from municipalities and police departments that deploy Flock or similar cameras "to surveil law abiding citizens". Massie's is announced rather than filed, and its text has not been released.

From the reporting

  • H.R. 9800 was introduced 21 July 2026 by Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) and referred to House Oversight and Government Reform. The text is public on congress.gov.
  • It covers ALPR, facial recognition, and biometric identification including fingerprint, iris, retina, voice and gait.
  • Data collected in violation must be deleted within 30 days and is inadmissible in any court or administrative proceeding.
  • Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) announced a separate funding-withholding bill on X. It has not been formally introduced and no text has been released.
  • Both would face resistance from law enforcement groups and from lawmakers who regard plate readers as a crime-fighting tool.
  • Recorded as ONGOING, not as a win. An announced bill is not a law, and an introduced bill referred to committee is where most bills stop.

Read the originalThis summary is ours. The reporting is Newsweek's, and the link below opens their page in a new tab.

Open Newsweek report (opens in a new tab)

Inclusion is not independent verification of every claim. Dates are the publisher's publication dates. Corrections are published, not quietly patched: see sources and corrections.