FLOCKINGHELLPUBLIC MONEY / PUBLIC ROADS / PUBLIC SAY
[ THE REPORTS DESK ]

WHAT ACTUALLY
HAPPENED.

Every report is summarised here in full, so you can read what happened without leaving. The link to the original reporting is always on the page, clearly labelled, because a claim you cannot check is worth nothing.

Win
The jurisdiction decided against the cameras: not renewed, not pursued, or cancelled.
Partial win
Use was suspended, paused, or narrowed, but the agreement itself still stands.
Ongoing
Live dispute. A vote, a review, or a removal question is still unresolved.
Contract retained
The jurisdiction kept the cameras, whatever the public turnout looked like.
Removal verified
Reporting confirms the hardware actually came down, not just that a vote happened.
Safety review
The installation itself is under challenge on road-safety or permitting grounds, separately from any privacy or contract question.
IMAGE VIA LOS ANGELES TIMES
Partial winLos Angeles, California

LAPD suspends use of Flock surveillance cameras over privacy issues

Published by
Los Angeles Times
Date
Location
Los Angeles, California
Status
Partial win

The Los Angeles Times reports that the LAPD suspended its use of Flock surveillance cameras over privacy issues. A suspension is not a cancellation: the department stopped using the system while the underlying questions were unresolved, which is why this sits as a partial win rather than a win.

Read the originalThis summary is ours. The reporting is Los Angeles Times's, and the link below opens their page in a new tab.

Open Los Angeles Times report (opens in a new tab)

Inclusion is not independent verification of every claim. Dates are the publisher's publication dates. Corrections are published, not quietly patched: see sources and corrections.